WebPaul Ohm [*]. In Van Buren v.United States, [2] the U.S. Supreme Court at long last waded into a decade-plus-old circuit split it had previously declined to take up. The dispute focused on a core definition at the heart of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), a federal law criminalizing certain acts by so-called computer hackers. [3] Originally enacted in … WebVan Buren’s focusing of the CFAA provides significant support for an authentication-based understanding of CFAA liability. Under that approach, the CFAA is violated only when a …
Van Buren v. United States - Wikipedia
WebVan Buren, there was a petition for cert pending before the Court in hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp. asking the Court to resolve the split as it related to data scraping. In that … WebJan 31, 2024 · Van Buren v. United States (2024) is the United States Supreme Court's first decision interpreting the federal computer crime law known as the Computer Fraud and … Focusing the CFAA in Van Buren. 2024 Supreme Court Review 155 (2024). … maple leaf foods new hamburg ontario
Van Buren is a Victory Against Overbroad Interpretations
WebJun 9, 2024 · Van Buren presented the question of whether someone “exceeds authorized access” under the CFAA, see 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (a) (2), by accessing a computer in violation of an authorized purpose, such as provided in an employer’s computer-use policy or a website’s terms of service. WebMay 18, 2024 · The Real Anneke Van Buren. Virtual Girlfriend, Goddess and GILF extraordinaire! #!My new alternate home. Please RT and follow if you’re following Annekenordstrum WebI have posted a new draft article, "Focusing the CFAA in Van Buren," forthcoming in the Supreme Court Review. It's about the Supreme Court's recent decision in Van Buren v. United States. The article is pretty short by law review standards, 29 pages, so it's not an endless read for those interested in the topic.Here's the abstract:Van Buren v. maple leaf foods phone number